Variations in African United states and White Women’s Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Males

Variations in African United states and White Women’s Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Males


The aim of the current research had been to look at racial differences in women’s attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual males and also to offer a knowledge of those distinctions. Individuals had been 224 18–30 yr old heterosexual African American (64percent) and White (36%) feminine undergraduates from a sizable metropolitan college in the southeastern united states of america. Individuals finished measures of social demographics, intimate orientation, and intimate prejudice. Outcomes revealed that African United states, in accordance with White, ladies endorsed more negative attitudes toward lesbians and men that are gay. Additionally, unlike White females, African women that are american more negative attitudes toward homosexual males than lesbians. Implications are talked about differences that are regarding cultural contexts that you can get between African American and White ladies.


Intimate prejudice is pervasive in the us and abroad and could be manifested in the shape of hate crimes as well as other functions of discrimination toward homosexual males and lesbians (Herek, 2000; 2007; Takacs, 2006; Yang, 1997). Nevertheless, considering the fact that probably the most serious functions are typically committed by males (Federal Bureau of research, 2006; Harlow, 2005; National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs NCAVP, 2007), a lot of the study on intimate prejudice centers around males. Hence, what exactly is understood about women’s attitudes toward lesbians and men that are gay mainly produced by evaluations of women’s attitudes in accordance with the attitudes of males. As the literary works indicates that heterosexual ladies are generally speaking more accepting of lesbians and homosexual males than heterosexual males ( ag e.g., Kite, 1984; Whitley & Kite, 1995), there is certainly most most likely great variability among ladies in their attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual males. In specific, there could be social and environmental facets that result in more negative attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual guys among African American ladies in accordance with White women ( ag e.g., Rhue & Rhue, 1997). Considering this literature, the goal of the current research ended up being to look at racial variations in attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual guys in African American and White ladies who are students into the southeastern united states of america. Our intention would be to empirically evaluate attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual males in a convenience test of African-American and females that are white. This research is very important because too few studies, in both the usa and abroad, have actually especially analyzed racial variations in intimate prejudice, particularly among heterosexual adult females. Thus, this research has the possibility to steer and inform future studies that seek to better perceive racial differences in intimate prejudice beyond those discovered for White and African American heterosexual males.

The literary works available about intimate prejudice in females reveals that women’s attitudes toward lesbians and men that are gay just examined with regards to men’s attitudes. More particularly, in university and community samples both in america as well as other nations, heterosexual guys, when compared with heterosexual women, have a tendency to report more unfavorable attitudes (in other words., greater prejudice that is sexual toward homosexual males, while heterosexual females, in accordance with heterosexual males, have a tendency to report more unfavorable attitudes toward lesbians (Gentry, 1987; Herek, 1988; Kite, 1994; Lim, 2002; Whitley, 1987, 1990). Other research reports have maybe maybe perhaps not supported this sex difference between attitudes toward lesbians (Herek, 1988; Kite 1984; Kite & Whitley 1996). However, research shows that heterosexual men’s attitudes toward homosexual guys are far more negative than heterosexual women’s attitudes toward lesbians (Herek, 2002; Kite & Whitley, 1996).

Despite these evaluations between gents and ladies, there additionally can be significant differences when considering ladies in their attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual guys. As an example, it’s likely that women’s attitudes vary significantly across social context. Provided the not enough research especially dedicated to ladies, it is vital to empirically examine feasible factors that are connected with intimate prejudice in females. One adjustable that would be related to variations in attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual guys is competition. There was some proof with this suspicion. Ernst, Rupert, Nevels, and Lemeh (1991) discovered, in a local, convenience test of usa workers from the Tennessee psychological state and Mental Retardation residential facilities that African US women endorsed notably greater quantities of sexual prejudice than White women. Nonetheless, this research utilized a measure that is one-item evaluate intimate prejudice and failed to differentiate between intimate prejudice toward homosexual males and intimate prejudice toward lesbians. In a study by Herek and Capitanio (1999) using a randomly chosen, nationwide likelihood test in the us, African US women reported greater intimate prejudice toward lesbians and homosexual guys than White women. Regrettably, this research failed to ascertain whether these distinctions had been statistically significant. Hence, despite these information, the extent to which racial distinctions occur in women’s attitudes toward lesbians and homosexual guys continues to be confusing.

Though restricted, these information are in line with relevant concept. Particularly, the use of intergroup conflict theories to the literary works shows that African US ladies, relative to White ladies, may report greater degrees of prejudice toward intimate minorities, specially homosexual guys. For instance, Stephan and Stephan (2000) developed a threat that is integrated of intergroup conflict that addresses an in-group’s perception of practical and symbolic hazard from an out-group. This model combines various theories of intergroup relations and conflict, such as for example practical team conflict concept (Sherif, Harvey, White, Hood, & Sherif, 1961) and team place concept (Bobo, 1988). In accordance with this integrated conceptualization, an organization experiences practical danger when it perceives another team as being a risk to its presence, to its governmental and financial energy, and also to its physical or well-being that is material. Furthermore, just like the more successful realistic team conflict concept (Sherif et al., 1961), conflict between teams can emerge as a result of identified or real competition for scarce resources.

Such responses to feasible threats may possibly occur among some African US ladies in a reaction to homosexual males. For instance, African US males who possess intercourse with males or whom self-identify as homosexual might be recognized by some African US ladies as leading to the low accessibility to African US males qualified to receive wedding (Ernst et al., 1991). African US ladies may believe homosexuality, like incarceration, provides another cause for the higher percentage of qualified African US heterosexual ladies to African American heterosexual males into the wedding pool in addition to greatest prices of unmarried females into the U.S. Adult populace (Tucker & Mitchell-Kernan, 1995). This instability is certainly not restricted to solitary women who have not married but additionally includes ladies who are divorced, divided, and widowed. Furthermore, its exacerbated by the proven fact that many partners choose their lovers from their race that is same or.

In addition, African women that are american attribute the bigger prices of AIDS among African US ladies, in accordance with ladies off their racial groups, to African American men who’ve intercourse with men and women (Boykin, 2005), specially because of the higher susceptibility of HIV disease from male than female lovers. These perceptions might be strengthened by general public medical researchers and advertising conversations (Malebranche, 2008). As an example, Valleroy, Prentiss, MacKellar, and Secura (2000) concluded that there is a “bisexual bridge, ” so that males that have sex with men and women transmit HIV to heterosexual African US females. Such perceptions may raise issues among African American ladies that express threat that is realistic the framework of this built-in hazard model (Stephan & Stephan, 2000). In change, this sensed hazard to African United states women’s wellbeing may set the phase for increased negative attitudes toward homosexual males as an out-group. But, in accordance with homosexual males, lesbians may well not pose a realistic danger to African US ladies in regards to competition for resources, economic and governmental power, or real or well-being that is emotional.